Author Topic: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.  (Read 125518 times)

Aaron McDonald

  • Administrator
  • **
  • Posts: 326
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #120 on: February 17, 2015, 10:54:22 AM »
The prof. has spoken.


Aaron, thanks for coaching Laura up FS . She was telling Martha how nice that was to have you there.

BTW.I am so glad my parents moved us out of the Boston area when I was 7.

Clink,

No problem!  I am very happy she did not give up! Laura did a great job.

kylequeener

  • Mudders
  • **
  • Posts: 183
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #121 on: February 18, 2015, 09:05:57 AM »
Holy tangent rant, this thread derailed a long time ago!


All we need to do now in order to make the tangent creditable is to bring up 9/11 conspiracy theories!



#thisthreadaintworthy

mungeclimber

  • PermaBan
  • ***
  • Posts: 6709
    • http://www.sonorapassclimbing.com
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #122 on: February 18, 2015, 09:13:58 AM »
Something broke, we never got to Godwin's Law references, did we?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law
On Aid at Pinns... It's all A1 til it crumbles. - Munge

Brad Young

  • Grand Master
  • ***
  • Posts: 6819
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #123 on: February 18, 2015, 09:15:03 AM »

Something broke, we never got to Godwin's Law references, did we?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law

Shut up you ignorant Nazi.

kylequeener

  • Mudders
  • **
  • Posts: 183
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #124 on: February 18, 2015, 09:16:12 AM »
Shut up you ignorant Nazi.


Yeah... what Brad said!

clink

  • Meanderthal
  • ****
  • Posts: 4104
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #125 on: February 18, 2015, 09:19:22 AM »
Granite is the ultimate thread drift on Masters of Mud.
Kyqueener, what you need is to find a pic of Bin Laden with granite FA possibilities in the background and post it here.

Causing trouble when not climbing.

Brad Young

  • Grand Master
  • ***
  • Posts: 6819
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #126 on: February 18, 2015, 09:26:27 AM »
Actually thread drift on Mudn'Crud is common and weird.

It seems that there is usually an ongoing discussion of who's up to what between most of us much of the time. Frequently that discussion occurs on whatever thread happens to be on top.

J.C. sniveled about this a few months ago, about all of us "jacking" his thread. He seemed to calm down though after I pointed out that it was our normal here: he'd start a thread about what he and Kat had been up to lately and then we'd all use it for our normal weekly discussions.

Carry on.

mungeclimber

  • PermaBan
  • ***
  • Posts: 6709
    • http://www.sonorapassclimbing.com
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #127 on: February 18, 2015, 11:03:34 AM »
lol

The circle is now complete.
On Aid at Pinns... It's all A1 til it crumbles. - Munge

Brad Young

  • Grand Master
  • ***
  • Posts: 6819
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #128 on: February 18, 2015, 11:33:46 AM »
Kumbaya  8)

clink

  • Meanderthal
  • ****
  • Posts: 4104
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #129 on: February 18, 2015, 12:23:49 PM »
Brad, it's Hakuna Matata!
Causing trouble when not climbing.

clink

  • Meanderthal
  • ****
  • Posts: 4104
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #130 on: February 18, 2015, 01:00:01 PM »
New routes 5.11 or harder since 2007 guidebook.

2008- 5.11b
2010- 5.11a
2011- 5.11b, 5.12b, 5.13c, and 5.14a

That's an average of less than one per year, or have I missed info?. Bet that changes.
Causing trouble when not climbing.

F4?

  • unworthy
  • Posts: 6176
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #131 on: February 18, 2015, 01:22:37 PM »
Piglet rules!

Mungie, I forgot to ask, do we refer to you as Dr. Mungie???
I'm not worthy.

mynameismud

  • unworthy
  • Posts: 5985
    • Mudncrud
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #132 on: February 18, 2015, 02:10:17 PM »
New routes 5.11 or harder since 2007 guidebook.

2008- 5.11b
2010- 5.11a
2011- 5.11b, 5.12b, 5.13c, and 5.14a

That's an average of less than one per year, or have I missed info?. Bet that changes.


Is 2007, Brad's book?
Here's to sweat in your eye

mungeclimber

  • PermaBan
  • ***
  • Posts: 6709
    • http://www.sonorapassclimbing.com
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #133 on: February 18, 2015, 03:53:05 PM »
yes, and the 13c is Hajime, correct?  That's a variant of two lines, no? I don't imagine it would have it's own bolt count.
On Aid at Pinns... It's all A1 til it crumbles. - Munge

clink

  • Meanderthal
  • ****
  • Posts: 4104
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #134 on: February 19, 2015, 05:33:53 AM »
Quote
yes, and the 13c is Hajime, correct?  That's a variant of two lines, no?

At the risk of sounding prejudiced, beyond 12c they all look the same to me.
Causing trouble when not climbing.

mynameismud

  • unworthy
  • Posts: 5985
    • Mudncrud
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #135 on: February 19, 2015, 11:34:33 AM »
yes, and the 13c is Hajime, correct?  That's a variant of two lines, no? I don't imagine it would have it's own bolt count.

link up, yes.
Here's to sweat in your eye

F4?

  • unworthy
  • Posts: 6176
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #136 on: February 19, 2015, 08:19:04 PM »
Clink has a point....splitting hairs are we?

 :ciappa:
I'm not worthy.

mungeclimber

  • PermaBan
  • ***
  • Posts: 6709
    • http://www.sonorapassclimbing.com
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #137 on: February 19, 2015, 08:53:54 PM »
No, it goes directly to the point of the rate of consumption.
On Aid at Pinns... It's all A1 til it crumbles. - Munge

clink

  • Meanderthal
  • ****
  • Posts: 4104
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #138 on: February 20, 2015, 06:32:42 AM »
Quote
Clink has a point....splitting hairs are we?

 Putting up routes of this difficulty, ground-up, is no small task. Ground-up is arduous, especially on Pinnacles rock. Not many recent takers at this level is my point.

 I have heard "all the good quality routes are done", blah, blah, blah. I think a couple of next generation climbers will end up proving this otherwise. My other point.
Causing trouble when not climbing.

kylequeener

  • Mudders
  • **
  • Posts: 183
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #139 on: February 20, 2015, 09:32:23 AM »


 I have heard "all the good quality routes are done", blah, blah, blah. I think a couple of next generation climbers will end up proving this otherwise. My other point.

I hope they show up soon!