Author Topic: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.  (Read 118216 times)

clink

  • Meanderthal
  • ****
  • Posts: 4012
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #140 on: February 20, 2015, 09:54:00 AM »
Quote
I hope they show up soon!

Me too.   :guitar:

Causing trouble when not climbing.

mynameismud

  • unworthy
  • Posts: 5974
    • Mudncrud
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #141 on: February 20, 2015, 09:56:06 AM »
Give me a few months.
Here's to sweat in your eye

JC w KC redux

  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6576
  • my density has brought me to you...
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #142 on: March 03, 2019, 01:13:56 PM »
New thread to discuss the merits of what is a good route, what is worthy of being bolted, what is the value of a stared route.

Link to where this started for a bit more history on the topic.

http://www.mudncrud.com/forums/index.php?topic=2177.new#new

I was playing on a rainy day and wanted to see the origin of this thread. It says it is missing or unavailable to me.
Well! I Never!
What's up Mud?  :biggrin:
One wheel shy of normal

F4?

  • unworthy
  • Posts: 6172
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #143 on: March 03, 2019, 01:33:33 PM »
Same fate as my Retro-Bolting thread I guess.
I'm not worthy.

mynameismud

  • unworthy
  • Posts: 5974
    • Mudncrud
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #144 on: March 03, 2019, 01:44:41 PM »
Not sure, will have to look into.  F4 will definitely have the mods delete all your posts.
Here's to sweat in your eye

F4?

  • unworthy
  • Posts: 6172
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #145 on: March 03, 2019, 08:11:05 PM »
I can never be silenced!!
I'm not worthy.

NOAL

  • Pin Heads
  • *
  • Posts: 1334
  • Hit Lichen Scrub
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #146 on: March 03, 2019, 11:35:45 PM »
As I remember, the link does not work because the original poster deleted the thread.  Anybody else remember that?

He also deleted all of his comments on this thread. 


F4?

  • unworthy
  • Posts: 6172
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #147 on: March 04, 2019, 05:35:09 AM »
Bummer, it’s a great idea to write out what aspects go into a new route.

I remember Mr. Mud said the color of the moss= rock quality.
I'm not worthy.

mynameismud

  • unworthy
  • Posts: 5974
    • Mudncrud
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #148 on: March 04, 2019, 08:04:36 AM »
I think Noal is correct. 
Here's to sweat in your eye

JC w KC redux

  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6576
  • my density has brought me to you...
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #149 on: March 04, 2019, 08:08:50 AM »
I think Noal is correct.  

I was asking because K Queener makes a comment early in the thread that makes it sound like he started it but Mr Mud's post is the first one. 

Kat just pointed out that Charles is listed a bit downthread on page 1 - so this must have been the infamous "living room" thread.

Thanks! and Here's Mud in Your Eye!
One wheel shy of normal

mungeclimber

  • PermaBan
  • ***
  • Posts: 6665
    • http://www.sonorapassclimbing.com
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #150 on: March 04, 2019, 09:33:06 PM »
Noal is correct. JC pm me if you need something specific. I copied parts of the original.
On Aid at Pinns... It's all A1 til it crumbles. - Munge

F4?

  • unworthy
  • Posts: 6172
Re: New Route Discussion: What is good/valid etc.
« Reply #151 on: March 04, 2019, 10:05:11 PM »
Mungie, do you have the part about using the power drill?
I'm not worthy.