Author Topic: All the Pretty Guidebooks  (Read 15507 times)

JC w KC redux

  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6634
  • my density has brought me to you...
All the Pretty Guidebooks
« on: December 20, 2017, 05:36:52 PM »
Well...it's official...I have all the real Pinns guidebooks (this omits Jonathan Richards).
I have perused JR's pages at Brad's casa and everything here naming Richards refers to Chuck.
My eyes are still a bit too dilated (from my visit to the eye doctor) for a complete reading, so I'll have to dive into Gagner tomorrow (I just got my copy today). My initial impression is a mixture of curiosity and disappointment. Only 18 pages in 10 years? The cover sketch is a hoot. It is a really clean copy but someone seems to have slammed two staples through the pages with no exit wound. The cover glue is partially separated in the front and back. I seriously doubt the staples are supposed to be there but I just thought I'd ask those who also own a copy. Did the publisher use staples on the interior binding?

I'll report back later but a quick blurry run through uncovers the fact that Gagner evidently did not believe in listing safety ratings and many of his ratings are vastly different from the other books (lowered difficulty). He doesn't even mention the safety designations in his intro pages. Neither do Roper or Richards. I find this very interesting given the current discussion of new routes and safety in general.



 
One wheel shy of "normal"

JC w KC redux

  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6634
  • my density has brought me to you...
Re: All the Pretty Guidebooks
« Reply #1 on: December 20, 2017, 05:57:59 PM »

Most interesting part of the intro pages (to me).
The extraordinarily bad geology info.
The note about Beyer's climbing style.

Now on to the route descriptions...
One wheel shy of "normal"

mungeclimber

  • PermaBan
  • ***
  • Posts: 6722
    • http://www.sonorapassclimbing.com
Re: All the Pretty Guidebooks
« Reply #2 on: December 20, 2017, 06:39:14 PM »
Two staples in my copy.
On Aid at Pinns... It's all A1 til it crumbles. - Munge

JC w KC redux

  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6634
  • my density has brought me to you...
Re: All the Pretty Guidebooks
« Reply #3 on: December 20, 2017, 07:28:23 PM »
One wheel shy of "normal"

clink

  • Meanderthal
  • ****
  • Posts: 4119
Re: All the Pretty Guidebooks
« Reply #4 on: December 21, 2017, 05:56:47 AM »
 So is it Gone-yay or Gag-ner?

 Gone :thumbup:

  :puke: ner

  Appauling, I know.

 What is Paul Gagner and the other guidebook writers doing nowadays? They all had a huge love for the place to put in the labor on a guide.
Causing trouble when not climbing.

NOAL

  • Pin Heads
  • *
  • Posts: 1454
  • Hit Lichen Scrub
Re: All the Pretty Guidebooks
« Reply #5 on: December 21, 2017, 08:21:28 AM »

JC w KC redux

  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6634
  • my density has brought me to you...
Re: All the Pretty Guidebooks
« Reply #6 on: December 21, 2017, 08:56:06 AM »
So far I have pages 20 and 90 missing or the book is simply mis-numbered (I think it is the latter).

I just got to Hanging Valley - which he omitted. That explains a few pages.

I would like to personally thank Gagner for continuing to perpetuate the myths about Crud and Mud that allowed me and clink to have some of the best days of our lives some 30+ years later  :yesnod: :thumbup: :biggrin: :ihih:

I just finished laughing after reading the comments he included from Beyer regarding Fear and Perspiration.
I think Noal has shared those with us previously.

One thing I have to say about the old format listing the FA with the description is...I like it.




One wheel shy of "normal"

mungeclimber

  • PermaBan
  • ***
  • Posts: 6722
    • http://www.sonorapassclimbing.com
Re: All the Pretty Guidebooks
« Reply #7 on: December 21, 2017, 09:58:29 AM »
Written descriptions have some of the best surprises.

Gone yay.


Yeah, he’s on supertopo too. Killing the big wall situation at Fischers and El Cap. True mountain spirit.
On Aid at Pinns... It's all A1 til it crumbles. - Munge

clink

  • Meanderthal
  • ****
  • Posts: 4119
Re: All the Pretty Guidebooks
« Reply #8 on: December 21, 2017, 10:26:51 AM »
Go Gone-yay!

Meanwhile, I am perpetuating the myth that I am a climber.
Causing trouble when not climbing.

mynameismud

  • unworthy
  • Posts: 5987
    • Mudncrud
Re: All the Pretty Guidebooks
« Reply #9 on: December 21, 2017, 10:47:45 AM »
I think previously safety ratings were omitted because at the time climbing was considered more of an adventure sport so risk was a given.  I think Beyer was given a note because he is/was a bit of a legend.  Perhaps a complete nut but perhaps that is what it takes.  If you climb all his routes you realize there is a certain style to them which sets them apart.  The Gagner book was my first guidebook ( not in real good shape anymore ).  

By the way Gagner was a very good climber that has done a ton of climbing and quality FA's ( Lunatic Fringe ).  I think his ratings are fairly accurate.  Back in the Stone Master days he was considered one of the best boulderers of the day.  I am glad to say that I actually watched him climb at the Pins.  One of the smoothest climbers you will ever see and one of the few people I have seen actually do a toe hook above their head while on lead.  On the rock he was amazing to watch.  He was also a very humble and kind person ( from my experience ).  I really admired this guy, I was just starting to climb and would talk to him on occasion at REI and North Face.  

I like the Richards guide.  It definitely has its faults but I like it, I really like his drawings and yes I am aware of its short comings.  
Here's to sweat in your eye

mungeclimber

  • PermaBan
  • ***
  • Posts: 6722
    • http://www.sonorapassclimbing.com
Re: All the Pretty Guidebooks
« Reply #10 on: December 21, 2017, 10:57:12 AM »
Quote
there is a certain style to them which sets them apart


Yeah, some Beyer routes were intentionally meant to sabotage. lol
On Aid at Pinns... It's all A1 til it crumbles. - Munge

mynameismud

  • unworthy
  • Posts: 5987
    • Mudncrud
Re: All the Pretty Guidebooks
« Reply #11 on: December 21, 2017, 11:05:16 AM »
Perhaps it would be better to say he is a very good climber instead of was.  But, I am not aware of what he is currently doing as I am completely out of the loop.
Here's to sweat in your eye

JC w KC redux

  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6634
  • my density has brought me to you...
Re: All the Pretty Guidebooks
« Reply #12 on: December 21, 2017, 11:17:39 AM »
Thanks for sharing Mud. I don't mean to be negative or take anything away from the man. No guidebook is perfect and I have a pretty good idea of the amount of work it takes to put something together and make it accurate. While I was reading and in particular looking at his ratings I wondered if this might have been your first book. :lol: I was also recalling that there was a time when 5.7 and 5.9 were the top of the scale. I mainly like having all the books so I can look up routes I haven't done yet (or ones I have) and see what the differences are. I noticed that Gagner has specific recommendations for iron that the other older books do not list. It's hard to say how many of the old routes were climbed with pins that were then removed - and let's face it - the scars left from those placements in mud are not as clean or apparent as they typically are in harder rock. :madman: There were a few surprises that really caught my eye. For instance, he mentions climbing past several lead bolts on p1 of the Salathe (on The Hand) when there is only one. He also sometimes combines routes with other routes - for example - Japanese Water Torture and Nodal Line, Toog's Terror and Toog's Alligator, Alias Bandit Bench and True Grit. It would be cool to have a document that has every shared route description in one place and in chronological order.

As for the older books (I don't include Brad's book since it is the current guide), I like the Chuck Richards Guide the best. It is the best looking, made the best (cover, binding, photos) and his sense of humor and writing style really appeal to me.  
One wheel shy of "normal"

mungeclimber

  • PermaBan
  • ***
  • Posts: 6722
    • http://www.sonorapassclimbing.com
Re: All the Pretty Guidebooks
« Reply #13 on: December 21, 2017, 11:37:52 AM »
The Young Dawson guide is way out of date. I hope someone does a new guide soon. :)
On Aid at Pinns... It's all A1 til it crumbles. - Munge

mynameismud

  • unworthy
  • Posts: 5987
    • Mudncrud
Re: All the Pretty Guidebooks
« Reply #14 on: December 21, 2017, 01:23:05 PM »
5.9 was the top of the scale a really long time ago.   5.13 was out before the Gagner guide.  Climbers and grades have just gotten softer.  When I started  climbing at the Pins it was common to see a rack ( consisting of more than draws ) at Discovery Wall.  It was fairly common to see climbers with slings.  Times change.  Safety is a big issue, adventure is an option.  Not saying either time is better, just different.  From what I see and experience, climbers and grades are softer. 
Here's to sweat in your eye

clink

  • Meanderthal
  • ****
  • Posts: 4119
Re: All the Pretty Guidebooks
« Reply #15 on: December 21, 2017, 05:57:59 PM »
Ya'll go ahead and keep your hands off my love handles.
Causing trouble when not climbing.

mynameismud

  • unworthy
  • Posts: 5987
    • Mudncrud
Re: All the Pretty Guidebooks
« Reply #16 on: December 21, 2017, 06:15:22 PM »
Not a chance
Here's to sweat in your eye

F4?

  • unworthy
  • Posts: 6176
Re: All the Pretty Guidebooks
« Reply #17 on: December 21, 2017, 07:10:36 PM »
Quote
Insert Quote
The Young Dawson guide is way out of date. I hope someone does a new guide soon.
It's criminal.
Such amazing routes like Los Banditos are not in the guide.

Now were the guide author to adopt the Apple or Microsoft strategy, they would release a new guide every 3 years.
Print the book with ink would start to fade after 3 years, forcing you to upgrade.
 :o

These days, I tend to leave the guide home and just call Mr. Mud at work for Beta.
I'm not worthy.

Brad Young

  • Grand Master
  • ***
  • Posts: 6853
Re: All the Pretty Guidebooks
« Reply #18 on: December 22, 2017, 07:58:28 PM »
My copy of Gagner's book is stapled (and both have slight rust on them). It is also missing pages 19 through 21 (recall me calling you about that - and you didn't yet have the book!).

Two other notes:

-  First ascent info with the route name and description automatically makes each entry longer. Although I also like that information with the route, that like is outweighed by the annoyance of having routes spread onto pages way before and/or way after where they appear on topos or photos. Another factor is "route trivia." Those who own the Sonora Pass guidebook know that in that book's first ascent appendix I included trivia about the route in about every tenth or fifteenth entry. I hope to try something like that with this new edition and listing the "trivia" with the route listing wouldn't be practical.

- What I call "danger" ratings (someone up thread called them safety ratings - either works) are relatively new to climbing guidebooks. David Rubine's 1991 Pinnacles guidebook is one of the first I recall that had them. Chockstone Press (the 1991 Pinns guide publisher) also published the 1987 Yosemite Valley guidebook and the 1988 Sierra Nevada East Side book. Neither used danger ratings.

(Now back to my cake; I can almost see it now under the remaining whipped cream.)


Brad Young

  • Grand Master
  • ***
  • Posts: 6853
Re: All the Pretty Guidebooks
« Reply #19 on: December 22, 2017, 08:01:48 PM »

My copy of Gagner's book is stapled (and both have slight rust on them).


Hey, that means that they're not stainless steel staples, right?  ;D